|
|
Wednesday, March 15
My child
I'm not sure that this is universally true and can only speak from my own experience, but one of the profound changes that occurred to me when I became a parent was that my perception of the world shifted. I have always valued and cared about children: they are one of the most vulnerable parts of our society and need the most care and protection, so when something happens to a child it is somehow more tragic or horrific. I am sure that many millions of people who aren't parents are also moved by stories of abuse or atrocities that happen to children in the world.
However, there is an extra dimension added by being a parent, I have found. Added to the "it shouldn't happen to (anyone let alone) a child" sentiment, is the horror of "what if that were my child?". It really doesn't bear thinking about in some cases but I suppose to fully appreciate the horrors that happen in the world (and I feel we have a duty to try to appreciate them so that we can care enough to try to change things), it is a sentiment that needs to be felt.
Like everyone with any ounce of feeling, I remember being horror-struck and deeply saddened by the tragedy at Dunblane ten years ago. But this week when I started to read about the father of one of the five-year-old victims, I found tears in my eyes as I imagined his loss: my elder Dragonet is only four. Equally difficult, this morning, was an article in an old LEPRA News about HIV/AIDS in India and the cases of transmission from mother to baby: the statistic that struck me was the fact that most of these infected babies don't live beyond the age of five.
Sometimes I wish that I had the power to be a mother to all children who needed me. I feel so privileged to be able to pick up my Dragonets and comfort them when they are ill or unhappy. I wish I could do this to the many millions of children who have no-one. Being a mother has changed me profoundly.
So you can imagine my shock and disgust, this morning, upon reading this article about a withdrawn advert by lastminute.com featuring Gary Glitter. I am relieved that the ASA has found them to be in breach of the decency clause but, as my brother and I commented this morning, one has to wonder what sort of person would propose such an idea in the first place, and what sort of person would approve it. Clearly, none of those involved were parents.
Scribbled by Dragon Mama
I may not be a parent yet... but I do adore my nieces, and I also have the feeling of "what if it had been [my niece]?” when I see stories like these... although maybe not to the same degree as you, their mum!
I am appalled that any company would even dream of using such a statement, and thinking they might be allowed to! They must have a very stupid marketing department!
Posted by Catey at 15032006 11:53
What sort of person?
An ordinary person, of course, not only because an action does not equal a person, but because we are all capable of lapses in judgement and doing wrong. It is the good people who regret and seek forgiveness; the good recognise a bad act done, but that doesn't mean they don't do them.
I would also be surprised were they parents, though.
It makes me think of something that occurs to me often - on the Web, people often forget this is the public domain. Sometimes I wish everyone, before putting anything online, would consider whether they would stand in front of television cameras and read out what they're about to post, as a public statement. If not, then perhaps it's something for e-mail, or not at all.
Posted by James Casey at 15032006 14:28
As for my second para above - comes across a bit too much as though I don't expect you know it already - it was more of a reminder (or at least the expression of my thoughts). I don't mean to come across as expressing anything that isn't obvious - it's the reading C S Lewis wot dun it, guv'nor!
Posted by James Casey at 15032006 14:30
I was at a lecture forum last night on multiculturalism, the media, the environment, health and the future. One of the speakers mentioned Bill Gates. Apparantly, when he was asked why he didn't send free computers to third-world children, he said that if every child was born by random chance, and my child was born to a woman in the third world, my first concerns wouldn't be "does that child have a computer?". It would be "is my child healthy?". Apparantly that's why he gives billions of dollars to child immunisation programmes.
Makes you think though - it's not a bad principle to apply.
Posted by Kirsty at 31032006 02:27
Post a comment
|
Dragon Mama's Virtual Cave
Archives
Date and Time
IMood:

Blogs:
JD-Blog
JC - the other one
Andrew
Brum Bum and Gerald
Catey
Pete
K
Tim
Fiona
Godfrey's Caff
Fran
Little Johns
Brian Dray
Catholic Claire
Keeping An Eye On:
The Lawleys
Mimi
Richii
Etchings
Promoting:
King's College London
Liverpool FC
The FABulous Beatles
Macca
Ringo
George
John
Brian May
Supporting:
The Vatican
Against:
Abortion
Embryo Abuse
Euthanasia
Human Rights Violations
Arms Trade
War
Dishonesty
Discrimination and Prejudice
Bloodsports
Cruelty to Animals
Studying:
The language of the sacred and the profane in medieval literature
Watching:
Vaticam
Shopping with:
RPoints
Dragon Dada is Collecting:
Star Wars Lego
Dragon Mama is Collecting:
Corgi
Wishing For:
if you want to pamper me...
Syndicate this site (XML)
Powered byMovable Type
|